Ford News Check here for all your Ford news & Mustang articles.

Ford F-150 pickup could get Mustang's V-6 engine

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-15-2010 | 11:34 AM
  #1  
CMOC Admin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 688
From: Brampton
Ford F-150 pickup could get Mustang's V-6 engine

Ford's F-150 pickup, the nation's best-selling vehicle for three decades, currently doesn't offer an entry-level V-6 engine, which was left on the table when the pickup was redesigned for 2009. That's going to change, according to PickupTrucks.com. The site says a naturally aspirated 3.7-liter V-6 is on its way by 2012.

The 3.7-liter displacement should sound familiar because sources for Cars.com's Kicking Tires blog say it's the same V-6 that was recently announced for the 2011 Ford Mustang. In the Mustang, this powerplant makes 305 horsepower and 280 pounds-feet of torque.

PickupTrucks.com says the new base engine could fill a few slots, including a low-cost option for fleets as well as an alternative to the soon-to-be-defunct Ford Ranger.

The other V-6 on its way is one we've known about and promises V-8 performance with V-6 fuel economy: Ford's EcoBoost V-6 is scheduled to make its debut in the F-150 by year's end.

--Joe Bruzek/Cars.com's Kicking Tires
Attached Thumbnails Ford F-150 pickup could get Mustang's V-6 engine-f150x-wide-community.jpg  
Old 01-15-2010 | 03:09 PM
  #2  
herbz's Avatar
CMOC Postaholic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,310
From: Cochrane, Alberta
305hp is decent but its going to need some more torque if its going in an F150 or its going to be a real dog.
Old 01-15-2010 | 10:01 PM
  #3  
1low03gt's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 17,778
From: Ontario
Agreed,but having the V6 there is a good idea for those that want a fuel economy full size pick up for the house yard duties,ects.If someone want's more power/torque for the more aggressive day to day work,then the V8 will fill that gap.
Old 01-16-2010 | 08:49 PM
  #4  
herbz's Avatar
CMOC Postaholic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,310
From: Cochrane, Alberta
I can see people wanting the fuel economy. Just speaking from my experience with a full size V6 pick-up I just have trouble seeing the point. I had a 00' F150 Reg Cab Flareside (pretty much the lightest configuration) with a 4.2 V6, it was severely underpowered and the fuel economy wasn't really all that great either because it had to work so hard to move the truck around. It got about 15mpg, I get that or more in my 05' F150 FX4 with a 5.4 V8 and it weighs tons more than the 00'.
Old 01-16-2010 | 10:22 PM
  #5  
SNAKEBITE's Avatar
I am the post KING
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,244
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by herbz
I can see people wanting the fuel economy. Just speaking from my experience with a full size V6 pick-up I just have trouble seeing the point. I had a 00' F150 Reg Cab Flareside (pretty much the lightest configuration) with a 4.2 V6, it was severely underpowered and the fuel economy wasn't really all that great either because it had to work so hard to move the truck around. It got about 15mpg, I get that or more in my 05' F150 FX4 with a 5.4 V8 and it weighs tons more than the 00'.
So right. The Ranger 4.0 gets the same mileage as the Triton 5.4
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
james
V6 & 2.3L
0
06-30-2008 01:08 PM
White_Snake
Mustang Related Want To Buy
0
02-05-2008 12:57 PM



Quick Reply: Ford F-150 pickup could get Mustang's V-6 engine



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 PM.