2006 Ford Mustang S281 SC Convertible - $39500
06-22-2010 | 08:20 AM
#1
Thread Starter
CMOC Newbie
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1
From: Stratford, PE
2006 Ford Mustang S281 SC Convertible - $39500
Category: Domestic
Status: Clean Title
I have a 2006 Ford Mustang S281 SC Convertible for sale, in Other - Prince Edward Island.
Mileage: 35000km
Asking price is $39500
-2006 Saleen S281 Supercharged convertible. Bumper number 007c
-Sold new at Advantage Ford in Calgary.
-Car is equipped with Laser Jammer system, GPS tracking alarm system and a Parrot bluetooth hands free system all added after the car was purchased.
-Car is extremely clean and has 3M protective coating on the front so no rock chips.
Car is one of only a handful 2006 Supercharged convertible Saleens built and sold in Canada. Very collectible car. Has approx 35,000kms, driven rarely and always stored in heated garage.
Car was ordered with Max Grip 3:55 gear ratio rear differential, Shaker 1000 Audio system with factory 12" sub, upgraded 20" chrome wheels and Pirelli tires all in great shape.
Car is still completely stock (435hp) but have the extreme 550hp package to go with the car.
Includes: 39# cobra injectors,
3.6" supercharger Pulley
Autolite HT0 spark plugs
New Serpentine belt
SCT Xcal 3 hand held tuner with custom tune from JDM Engineering, Saleen specialists.
Saleen Extreme air intake upgrade.
I also installed new Brembo 14" brake upgrade.
I am open to offers!
403-969-3611
Status: Clean Title
I have a 2006 Ford Mustang S281 SC Convertible for sale, in Other - Prince Edward Island.
Mileage: 35000km
Asking price is $39500
-2006 Saleen S281 Supercharged convertible. Bumper number 007c
-Sold new at Advantage Ford in Calgary.
-Car is equipped with Laser Jammer system, GPS tracking alarm system and a Parrot bluetooth hands free system all added after the car was purchased.
-Car is extremely clean and has 3M protective coating on the front so no rock chips.
Car is one of only a handful 2006 Supercharged convertible Saleens built and sold in Canada. Very collectible car. Has approx 35,000kms, driven rarely and always stored in heated garage.
Car was ordered with Max Grip 3:55 gear ratio rear differential, Shaker 1000 Audio system with factory 12" sub, upgraded 20" chrome wheels and Pirelli tires all in great shape.
Car is still completely stock (435hp) but have the extreme 550hp package to go with the car.
Includes: 39# cobra injectors,
3.6" supercharger Pulley
Autolite HT0 spark plugs
New Serpentine belt
SCT Xcal 3 hand held tuner with custom tune from JDM Engineering, Saleen specialists.
Saleen Extreme air intake upgrade.
I also installed new Brembo 14" brake upgrade.
I am open to offers!
403-969-3611
07-29-2010 | 07:11 AM
#3
Retired Admin
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,821
From: Barrie, Ontario
I want this car.
07-29-2010 | 02:06 PM
#5
I am the post KING
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,244
From: Calgary
Good luck and sweet ride
07-29-2010 | 03:23 PM
#6
Adminut
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,722
From: Maple Tree, Branch #2 above the rope swing
Anybody know wtf a "Laser Jammer System" does? Is that anything like photon torpedo's? I've honestly never heard of it, but good luck on the sale, it's a real beauty.
07-29-2010 | 05:45 PM
#7
CMOC Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 465
From: Calgary, AB
Active radar jammers work on the principle of interfering with or overwhelming the doppler shift that occurs from the reflected radar beam that police RADAR guns require to obtain a vehicles speed.
Unlike police laser (at least in most states), police RADAR can not be legally jammed, in fact, any attempt to do so (whether one is successful or not, most active radar jammers are not) is a federal offence and violates FCC regulations. Late in 1997, the FCC also ruled that so-called passive-reflector type "radar scramblers" are also illegal to operate whether they are effective or not (they're not) because the FCC considers any attempt as "malicious interference" and as such can not be licensed by the FCC (radar detectors are also subject to FCC licensing requirements since they too emit RF).
While active radar jammers are most certainly illegal (unlike laser jammers), they are mostly ineffective, especially against the latest digital RADAR guns.
Older analogue radar jammers did have some jamming effect on older analogue X-band and K-band RADAR but were often bulky, cumbersome to operate, and ran continously - setting of every radar detector in the immediate vacinity. This ended up having the effect of having vehicles in front of you hit the brakes and slow down which presented problems for drivers equipped with such a radar jammer.
Furthermore, analogue radar jammers tend to lose their calibration and eventually go out of tune - further diminishing their radar jamming effectiveness over time.
Today, advanced police radar guns can inform the officer that someone is interfering with it with a radar jammer. It does so easily by monitoring the return RADAR frequency of the jammer during the time that the police radar gun doesn't transmit - a dead giveaway to the user of an active radar jammer.
In some cases, a radar jammer may inadvertently produce a higher indicated speed on the officer's radar gun! Can you picture trying to explain to a police officer how his 95mph reading of you was introduced by your jammer and not by your actual speed?
At any rate, police RADAR has progressed today to be primarily digital, which makes them more accurate, less prone to error, and much more difficult to jam effectively. This is especially true with the most popular form selling today - digital (DSP) KA.
Don't even think about attempting to use a "passive jammer" or to passively disable or "scramble" police RADAR as your vehicle's own reflections will most certainly overwhelm any "passive jammer/reflector" by several orders of magnitude. These devices don't even make a good radar detector.
Unlike police laser (at least in most states), police RADAR can not be legally jammed, in fact, any attempt to do so (whether one is successful or not, most active radar jammers are not) is a federal offence and violates FCC regulations. Late in 1997, the FCC also ruled that so-called passive-reflector type "radar scramblers" are also illegal to operate whether they are effective or not (they're not) because the FCC considers any attempt as "malicious interference" and as such can not be licensed by the FCC (radar detectors are also subject to FCC licensing requirements since they too emit RF).
While active radar jammers are most certainly illegal (unlike laser jammers), they are mostly ineffective, especially against the latest digital RADAR guns.
Older analogue radar jammers did have some jamming effect on older analogue X-band and K-band RADAR but were often bulky, cumbersome to operate, and ran continously - setting of every radar detector in the immediate vacinity. This ended up having the effect of having vehicles in front of you hit the brakes and slow down which presented problems for drivers equipped with such a radar jammer.
Furthermore, analogue radar jammers tend to lose their calibration and eventually go out of tune - further diminishing their radar jamming effectiveness over time.
Today, advanced police radar guns can inform the officer that someone is interfering with it with a radar jammer. It does so easily by monitoring the return RADAR frequency of the jammer during the time that the police radar gun doesn't transmit - a dead giveaway to the user of an active radar jammer.
In some cases, a radar jammer may inadvertently produce a higher indicated speed on the officer's radar gun! Can you picture trying to explain to a police officer how his 95mph reading of you was introduced by your jammer and not by your actual speed?
At any rate, police RADAR has progressed today to be primarily digital, which makes them more accurate, less prone to error, and much more difficult to jam effectively. This is especially true with the most popular form selling today - digital (DSP) KA.
Don't even think about attempting to use a "passive jammer" or to passively disable or "scramble" police RADAR as your vehicle's own reflections will most certainly overwhelm any "passive jammer/reflector" by several orders of magnitude. These devices don't even make a good radar detector.
Last edited by Kaisoboy; 07-29-2010 at 05:53 PM.
07-29-2010 | 06:35 PM
#8
Adminut
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,722
From: Maple Tree, Branch #2 above the rope swing
Thanks man - I had no idea. I guess a jammer is different that a straight up radar detector, which doesn't try to jam it, just lets you know its there?
07-29-2010 | 07:02 PM
#9
Retired Admin
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,821
From: Barrie, Ontario
I want to buy this car even more now just so I can say it's equipped with a laser jamming system .... I don't know if it works or not but it definetly sounds badass.
07-30-2010 | 07:40 AM
#10
I am the post KING
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,244
From: Calgary
Active radar jammers work on the principle of interfering with or overwhelming the doppler shift that occurs from the reflected radar beam that police RADAR guns require to obtain a vehicles speed.
Unlike police laser (at least in most states), police RADAR can not be legally jammed, in fact, any attempt to do so (whether one is successful or not, most active radar jammers are not) is a federal offence and violates FCC regulations. Late in 1997, the FCC also ruled that so-called passive-reflector type "radar scramblers" are also illegal to operate whether they are effective or not (they're not) because the FCC considers any attempt as "malicious interference" and as such can not be licensed by the FCC (radar detectors are also subject to FCC licensing requirements since they too emit RF).
While active radar jammers are most certainly illegal (unlike laser jammers), they are mostly ineffective, especially against the latest digital RADAR guns.
Older analogue radar jammers did have some jamming effect on older analogue X-band and K-band RADAR but were often bulky, cumbersome to operate, and ran continously - setting of every radar detector in the immediate vacinity. This ended up having the effect of having vehicles in front of you hit the brakes and slow down which presented problems for drivers equipped with such a radar jammer.
Furthermore, analogue radar jammers tend to lose their calibration and eventually go out of tune - further diminishing their radar jamming effectiveness over time.
Today, advanced police radar guns can inform the officer that someone is interfering with it with a radar jammer. It does so easily by monitoring the return RADAR frequency of the jammer during the time that the police radar gun doesn't transmit - a dead giveaway to the user of an active radar jammer.
In some cases, a radar jammer may inadvertently produce a higher indicated speed on the officer's radar gun! Can you picture trying to explain to a police officer how his 95mph reading of you was introduced by your jammer and not by your actual speed?
At any rate, police RADAR has progressed today to be primarily digital, which makes them more accurate, less prone to error, and much more difficult to jam effectively. This is especially true with the most popular form selling today - digital (DSP) KA.
Don't even think about attempting to use a "passive jammer" or to passively disable or "scramble" police RADAR as your vehicle's own reflections will most certainly overwhelm any "passive jammer/reflector" by several orders of magnitude. These devices don't even make a good radar detector.
Unlike police laser (at least in most states), police RADAR can not be legally jammed, in fact, any attempt to do so (whether one is successful or not, most active radar jammers are not) is a federal offence and violates FCC regulations. Late in 1997, the FCC also ruled that so-called passive-reflector type "radar scramblers" are also illegal to operate whether they are effective or not (they're not) because the FCC considers any attempt as "malicious interference" and as such can not be licensed by the FCC (radar detectors are also subject to FCC licensing requirements since they too emit RF).
While active radar jammers are most certainly illegal (unlike laser jammers), they are mostly ineffective, especially against the latest digital RADAR guns.
Older analogue radar jammers did have some jamming effect on older analogue X-band and K-band RADAR but were often bulky, cumbersome to operate, and ran continously - setting of every radar detector in the immediate vacinity. This ended up having the effect of having vehicles in front of you hit the brakes and slow down which presented problems for drivers equipped with such a radar jammer.
Furthermore, analogue radar jammers tend to lose their calibration and eventually go out of tune - further diminishing their radar jamming effectiveness over time.
Today, advanced police radar guns can inform the officer that someone is interfering with it with a radar jammer. It does so easily by monitoring the return RADAR frequency of the jammer during the time that the police radar gun doesn't transmit - a dead giveaway to the user of an active radar jammer.
In some cases, a radar jammer may inadvertently produce a higher indicated speed on the officer's radar gun! Can you picture trying to explain to a police officer how his 95mph reading of you was introduced by your jammer and not by your actual speed?
At any rate, police RADAR has progressed today to be primarily digital, which makes them more accurate, less prone to error, and much more difficult to jam effectively. This is especially true with the most popular form selling today - digital (DSP) KA.
Don't even think about attempting to use a "passive jammer" or to passively disable or "scramble" police RADAR as your vehicle's own reflections will most certainly overwhelm any "passive jammer/reflector" by several orders of magnitude. These devices don't even make a good radar detector.
